Today I was giving some advice to a young lady getting rather hot under the collar about her presentation for Theory of Knowledge, when it struck me that it was so often the vexed question of curiosity, or rather the lack of it, that might be at the root of her difficulties, and those of so many students I come into contact with. Essentially my advice boils down to this: it's useful to be genuinely interested in how you know what you know, or think you know, and how others know, or think they know, what they know in framing an issue for a presentation. Once you get interested in that, what to do follows naturally. (Although it also involves a lot of real work as opposed to vaguely tossing around opinions.)
Quite often, when discussing presentations, I find myself simply asking students how they know what they claim to know as they make their various statements, hoping that this will make them think in TOK-fashion. Quite a few look at me as if I'm mad, for which I don't really blame them. My guess is that they'd rather I tell them what to say and they think I'm kidding when I tell them I don't know what to tell them to say.
The odd thing is that whilst I am extremely lazy in intellectual terms in any number of embarrassing ways, an unhealthy sense of curiosity about pretty much anything that can be questioned has never been one of my failings. So I just don't get it when people (some really very bright ones in many ways) appear to revel in a profound incuriosity to get them through life.
2 comments:
It's terrible. I am going through the same phase of TOK education as you are right now. And often all I get is, "Show me what to do and I will do it, let's not waste time." Which really means, "O Master, I will do whatever you think is necessary to secure a grade, but please don't educate me!" Sigh.
Yes, a wonderfully, woefully accurate translation.
It all reminds me of an acutely insightful comment Northrop Frye makes near the beginning of one of his Bible books - I think it's The Great Code. He makes the point that from the teacher's perspective education is a process of breaking down the student's very active resistance to all the new data necessary to educate him or her. He puts it a lot better than that, of course, but I think I've got the essence of it.
I'm reminded particularly of those inspired attempts of students to ace Literature exams by avoiding actually reading any of their texts.
Post a Comment