I’ve now read both of the books, Gone To Texas and Until The End Of The World, and doubt that I’ll be moving onto number three despite being left hanging at the end of number two. To some degree I did enjoy the books, that degree being that there was enough story to keep me interested. Unfortunately to get to the story you need to wade through lots of profanity, a tiresome obsession with violence, an equally tiresome fixation on sentimental bonding, and a sort of adolescent desire to keep shocking the reader. The problem is that this reader is beyond being shocked but not beyond getting tired of storytellers’ adolescent obsessions.
When gore and nastiness is done well, think Gaiman and Moore, I’m rather in favour of it. But the Preacher never comes close to those levels. Above all, it was the sentimentality of the series that bothered me, a sentimentality that manifested itself in the three central characters being allowed to get away with anything on the (implied) grounds that they possessed some sort of depth. Unfortunately they didn't.
3 comments:
Errrk. Don't like Ennis and Dillon. They were execrable in their run on John Constantine, Hellblazer as well.
Right now I'm looking at Seth Grahame-Smith's Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, which is terrible on the face of it but a lot of fun, and Adam Roberts's Swiftly, an intriguing sequel to Gulliver's Travels.
Yes, Errrk is deadly accurate. The others sound interesting. I'll be on the look-out.
Yes, Errrk is deadly accurate. The others sound interesting. I'll be on the look-out.
Post a Comment