I started reading Stendhal's The Red and the Black back in early September and have only got as far as page 140 in the Penguin Classics edition. Quite embarrassingly slow progress I suppose, but only for someone capable of embarrassment. For my shameless self it's a matter of some amusement - as is the novel so far.
I thought that reading a 19C French classic would bear some resemblance to reading other classic novels of the century, whether they be French, Russian, German, American or British. This is not the case with Stendhal. He's not outrageously experimental in the vein of chaps like Sterne & Rabelais, who are sort of creating the form of the novel as a genre as they go along. But, as far as I can tell, he is doing something very different from all his contemporaries and doing it with extraordinary panache. So our hero, Julien Sorel - if he is a hero in any meaningful sense - is clearly going to have his story told a la David Copperfield, Maggie Tulliver, Rastignac, and Emma Bovary. But it's being told very differently and I can't articulate what the difference is.
This reflects badly on me, I know, and possibly it's just a case of me being very slow and missing the point. But I'm having a fine old time doing so and am happily beguiled by every page. (I burst out laughing twice on page 138 and I'm not at all sure there are meant to be jokes in the text.)
Anyway, I'll probably try and write a bit more about this when (and if) I sort my confusions out. In the meantime I'll just crack on and pretend I know exactly what's happening.